Dear Developers,
I installed the latest version of Allpix2 using the Docker file with this FROM:
FROM gitlab-registry.cern.ch/allpix-squared/allpix-squared/allpix-squared-deps:v2
Since some parameters have been changed wrt the old Allpix2 version that I was using (v. 1.6), I want to make sure that I obtain consistent results if I use exactly the same EF / WP maps extracted from TCAD.
I encountered a problem with the Weighting Potential Reader module, since this was the weighting potential map that I obtained with the old version (it’s a .init file computed for a 3x3 sub-matrix)
With the new Allpix2 version, I had to add the field_mapping parameter, for both the electric field and the weighting potential module. I already checked that the electric field plotted in the ElectricFieldReader module is consistent, but for the WP I obtained this strange plot:
I would like to use a 3x3 weighting potential map and I’m using the field_mapping = SENSOR.
Could you help me to understand the problem?
Thanks a lot,
Chiara
Ciao @cferrero
could you post the full configuration section of the WeightingPotentialReader
module by any chance? Thanks!
/Simon
…and one more idea: Does it work if you set the field_mapping = PIXEL_FULL
?
You have an electrode-centered 3x3 matrix, so always starting from the pixel center should work…
Dear @simonspa,
thanks for your reply. This was my configuration for the module:
[WeightingPotentialReader]
model = “mesh”
field_mapping=“SENSOR”
file_name = “Name_file.init”
output_plots = true
but now I moved to “PIXEL_FULL” and it seems working well
The only point that I don’t understand is the potenzial_z plot, which looks like this:
I don’t know which z-coordinate this plot is referring to, I saw the parameter
output_plots_position
: which is the 2D Position in x and y, but I don’t see a parameter to fix the z coordinate for the plotting.
Thanks,
Chiara
Hi @cferrero
thanks for reporting back, indeed the SENSOR
version should not even be possible for the weighting potential… I fixed this in WeightingPotentialReader: Exclude SENSOR mapping (!882) · Merge requests · Allpix Squared / Allpix Squared · GitLab
Also there, I added a new parameter (and updated the docuemntation to clarify) for your second issue - right now, the value is always taken at z = 0
. so in the center of the sensor. Which admittedly doesn’t make a lot of sense in many cases. With the new parameter you can chose the depth (between +d/2 and -d/2 where d is the thickness).
Cheers,
Simon
Thanks a lot Simon for your support,
Cheers,
Chiara